Re: relpersistence and temp table
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: relpersistence and temp table |
Дата | |
Msg-id | BANLkTimDZHJJ-Ha_uUYmWV21_azxh8Cgfw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: relpersistence and temp table (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: relpersistence and temp table
Re: relpersistence and temp table |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 10:32 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 8:06 AM, Amit Khandekar > <amit.khandekar@enterprisedb.com> wrote: >> In 9.1, if a table is created using an explicit pg_temp qualification, >> the pg_class.relpersistence is marked 'p', not 't'. > > That's a bug. Thanks for the report. OK, so I think the problem here is that, in 9.0, it was possible to figure out what value relistemp should take at a very late date, because it was entirely a function of the schema name. A temporary schema implies relistemp = true, while a non-temporary schema implies relistemp = false. However, in 9.1, that clearly won't do, since unlogged and permanent tables can share the same schema. Moreover, by the time we get as far as RelationBuildLocalRelation(), we've already made lots of other decisions based on relpersistence, so it seems that we need to make this correct as early as possible. It's not feasible to do that in the parser, because the creation namespace could also come from search_path: SET search_path = pg_temp; CREATE TABLE foo (a int); So it seems we can't fix this any earlier than RangeVarGetCreationNamespace(). In the attached patch, I took basically that approach, but created a new function RangeVarAdjustRelationPersistence() that does the actual adjusting (since de-constifying RangeVarGetCreationNamespace() didn't seem smart), plus adds a bunch of additional sanity-checking that I previously overlooked. Namely, it forbids: - creating unlogged tables in temporary schemas - creating relations in temporary schemas of other sessions On the other hand, it does allow CREATE TEMP TABLE pg_temp.foo(a int), which was somewhat pointlessly forbidden by previous releases. In short, the code now checks directly what it used to check by inference: that you're not creating a temporary table in a permanent schema, or the other way around. I also rearranged a few other bits of code to make sure that the appropriate fixups happen BEFORE we enforce the condition that temporary tables mustn't be created in security-restricted contexts. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: