Re: 9.2 branch and 9.1beta2 timing (was Re: InitProcGlobal cleanup)
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: 9.2 branch and 9.1beta2 timing (was Re: InitProcGlobal cleanup) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | BANLkTim+hPQV76KrxZyt_gUOx1n81FnEng@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: 9.2 branch and 9.1beta2 timing (was Re: InitProcGlobal cleanup) ("Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 5:35 PM, Kevin Grittner <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov> wrote: > Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: > >> It appears that the open items list is a bit stale: >> >> http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_9.1_Open_Items >> >> The first item listed there is, I believe, fixed. > > That was "SSI HOT chain traversal issue" -- which was fixed. I just > moved it to "Resolved Issues". > >> I'm not sure about the second. > > That's "Make DDL commands SSI-aware". That is two to four lines of > code away from complete, but I got stuck last time I tried to figure > out where to put those lines. The code for DROP TABLE and TRUNCATE > TABLE is not quite as easy to follow as most of the PostgreSQL code > base -- or so it seemed to me. I'll take another run at it. A > patch will be forthcoming on Sunday at the latest. All other DDL > commands are done and have been through some testing. > >> If anyone is aware of stuff we need to get done, please add it >> there... > > I've submitted a comment-only patch and will be submitting a patch > by Sunday to add a few more lines to README-SSI. I don't know that > those are beta2 blockers, though. Should I add them to "Not > Blockers for Beta2"? Either is fine. Comment patches are easy. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: