Re: bytea performance tweak
От | Maciek Sakrejda |
---|---|
Тема | Re: bytea performance tweak |
Дата | |
Msg-id | BANLkTike_g56WHUxF7yEndaji_Dj+gFphA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | bytea performance tweak (Andreas Schmitz <schmitz@occamlabs.de>) |
Список | pgsql-jdbc |
> I started with different assumption - encode everything in binary, eventually fix server. I didn't realize the server lacked binary support for some types. I guess the driver can disclose this as a caveat emptor when documenting the binary flag. If you know your particular query workload will not use certain types, it's not really an issue. If you can't be sure, that's pretty much a show-stopper unless there's some kind of automatic fallback to text mode at the driver level, which sounds much too crazy to be useful. > Problems are with timestamp encoding , here you can't send unknown, and I don't think it will be fixed in any way. What issue are you talking about here? Is it related to this: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-jdbc/2006-12/msg00037.php ? If so, we don't necessarily need to implement binary parameter input to support binary result output. --- Maciek Sakrejda | System Architect | Truviso 1065 E. Hillsdale Blvd., Suite 215 Foster City, CA 94404 (650) 242-3500 Main www.truviso.com
В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления: