Re: Unfriendly handling of pg_hba SSL options with SSL off
От | Magnus Hagander |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Unfriendly handling of pg_hba SSL options with SSL off |
Дата | |
Msg-id | BANLkTikZuv1X+SG+RmEQ1YSg9QcxAzhSwQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Unfriendly handling of pg_hba SSL options with SSL off (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Unfriendly handling of pg_hba SSL options with SSL off
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 05:39, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes: >> Late reply, but we are basically ignoring 'local' lines if the build >> doesn't support unix domain sockets (windows), but throwing an error for >> hostssl usage if ssl is not compiled in. Is the only logic here that >> 'local' is part of the default pg_hba.conf and hostssl is not? Is that >> good logic? > > I wouldn't have a problem with making the Windows port throw an error > for "local" lines. We'd have to fix initdb to remove that line from the > sample file (if it doesn't already), but that's surely not hard. It does already (that's what the @remove-line-for-nolocal@ markup in the sample file is for). So +1 for making it throw an error. -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: