Re: PostgreSQL + FreeBSD memory configuration, and an issue
От | Gipsz Jakab |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PostgreSQL + FreeBSD memory configuration, and an issue |
Дата | |
Msg-id | BANLkTikV+whHxiXVwJvpotvswao_WAKK7Q@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PostgreSQL + FreeBSD memory configuration, and an issue (Vick Khera <vivek@khera.org>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
Ok Vick, thanks, and sorry for the off-list message.
regards,
Carl
2011/4/8 Vick Khera <vivek@khera.org>
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 9:53 AM, Gipsz Jakab <clausewitz45@gmail.com> wrote:Thanks Vick, I'll try it tonight. I will give 1024 shared_buffers and maintenance_work_mem, and 102 MB of work_mem.A question: I didn't use (it's marked with #) the effective_planner (or any other planner method or config option). Is it ok, when I turn it on with that parameter: 1036MB?the variables below are all the ones I change from default other than the logging settings (I like more verbose logging).I have no opinion or experiences on any other settings.DROP/ADD TABLE stuck: I realized, that the locks number is so high, what about these settings:I don't think it has to do with number of locks, but with actually waiting for a lock.deadlock_timeout = 1smax_locks_per_transaction = 64is it ok? or is it too high?That depends really on your application's needs. I wouldn't change it unless you get warnings that you are hitting this limit.Please keep the message on-list.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: