Re: use less space in xl_xact_commit patch

On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 7:25 AM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> With regards to the naming, I think it would be better if we kept
> XLOG_XACT_COMMIT record exactly as it is now, and make the second
> record an entirely new record called XLOG_XACT_COMMIT_FASTPATH. That
> way we retain backwards compatibility.

I liked your previous suggestion of commit and commit-with-info
better.  There's nothing particularly fast about this; it's just less
info.  So to speak.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company