Re: date_part for infinity intervals
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: date_part for infinity intervals |
Дата | |
Msg-id | BANLkTik71qWhTDOLbPEKEL7At755znfo4g@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | date_part for infinity intervals (Vlad Arkhipov <arhipov@dc.baikal.ru>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 5:54 AM, Vlad Arkhipov <arhipov@dc.baikal.ru> wrote: > The behaviour of date_part function is opaque for infinity intervals. For > example > date_part('epoch', 'infinity'::date) and date_part('year', 'infinity'::date) > return zero but is supposed to return 'infinity', > date_part('day', 'infinity'::date) returns zero, should it return 'NaN' > instead? Dunno. It's been this way since 2001; before that, it returned NULL. I don't see any particular justification for making the return value different in the infinity case depending on whether "epoch" or "day" is requested. Returning "Infinity" rather than 0 might have some merit, but I'm not sure it's worth breaking backward compatibility for it. What do our competitors do in this case? -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: