Re: BYTEA or LO?
От | Merlin Moncure |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BYTEA or LO? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | BANLkTik-LMG33pxNg-9x1_w4h5p5m+qb5Q@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: BYTEA or LO? ("Jean-Yves F. Barbier" <12ukwn@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: BYTEA or LO?
|
Список | pgsql-novice |
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 2:01 PM, Jean-Yves F. Barbier <12ukwn@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, 31 May 2011 13:40:02 -0500, "ktm@rice.edu" <ktm@rice.edu> wrote: > > ... >> That is needed to use the non-binary API. You can also use hex encoding >> starting with 9.0, I think. The data is stored in binary internally so you >> should not get a 33% bump in size. If you use the binary API, you can avoid >> the hex/base64 encoding pass as well. > > I just read the doc but didn't fully understand the binary part. > > Do you mean that with BYTEA binary type I can directly R/W my pictures > without any transcoding trick? If you are using libpq or another driver that exports this feature of the protocol, yes. merlin
В списке pgsql-novice по дате отправления: