Re: FWD: fastlock+lazyvzid patch performance
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: FWD: fastlock+lazyvzid patch performance |
Дата | |
Msg-id | BANLkTik-2H=e6dQnK_zJEiyR374Ye8_OmQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | FWD: fastlock+lazyvzid patch performance (karavelov@mail.bg) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 3:31 PM, <karavelov@mail.bg> wrote: > I post this results because they somehow contradict with previous results > posted on the list. In > my case the patches does not only improve peak performance but also improve > the performance > under load - without patches the performance with 256 clients is 53% of the > peak performance > that is obtained with 8 clients, with patches the performance with 256 > client is 79% of the peak > with 8 clients. I think this is strongly related to core count. The spinlock contention problems don't become really bad until you get up above 32 CPUs... at least from what I can tell so far. So I'm not surprised it was just a straight win on your machine... but thanks for verifying. It's helpful to have more data points. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: