Re: Branch 1.14?
От | Dave Page |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Branch 1.14? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | BANLkTi=uVkfYqWdrsU9b7cnppSubdMfi2A@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Branch 1.14? (Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume@lelarge.info>) |
Ответы |
Re: Branch 1.14?
|
Список | pgadmin-hackers |
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 6:57 AM, Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume@lelarge.info> wrote: > On Tue, 2011-06-14 at 23:41 +0100, Dave Page wrote: >> We don't tend to remove the old code as that can lead to painful >> amounts of refactoring to make things look right afterwards. If you >> feel so inclined though, go ahead and do some cleanup. >> > > I don't see why we should remove old code that still works. That we say > we don't "officially" support older versions than 8.2, that's one thing > I would understand. Working on dropping code that should work to make > sure no one can use it with older versions is something I can't > understand. Well we don't actually know that it does still work, as we haven't tested it. I regularly find myself refactoring code for old versions of Postgres because I need to add support for a new version, and if it's something old like 7.3, it doesn't get tested. Plus it make the code less readable, and harder to maintain. -- Dave Page Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com Twitter: @pgsnake EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgadmin-hackers по дате отправления: