Re: time-delayed standbys
От | Simon Riggs |
---|---|
Тема | Re: time-delayed standbys |
Дата | |
Msg-id | BANLkTi=nvWefCymUz8_mT_UK16trw-si6Q@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: time-delayed standbys (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: time-delayed standbys
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 2:56 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 9:54 PM, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> wrote: >>> I am not sure exactly how walreceiver handles it if the disk is full. >>> I assume it craps out and eventually retries, so probably what will >>> happen is that, after the standby's pg_xlog directory fills up, >>> walreceiver will sit there and error out until replay advances enough >>> to remove a WAL file and thus permit some more data to be streamed. >> >> Nope, it gets stuck and stops there. Replay doesn't advance unless you >> can somehow clear out some space manually; if the disk is full, the disk >> is full, and PostgreSQL doesn't remove WAL files without being able to >> write files first. >> >> Manual (or scripted) intervention is always necessary if you reach disk >> 100% full. > > Wow, that's a pretty crappy failure mode... but I don't think we need > to fix it just on account of this patch. It would be nice to fix, of > course. How is that different to running out of space in the main database? If I try to pour a pint of milk into a small cup, I don't blame the cup. -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: