Re: Bug? Text field is not viewable in a table...
От | Dave Page |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Bug? Text field is not viewable in a table... |
Дата | |
Msg-id | BANLkTi=MTad2N3t00m5gN5G8x1hVM2hXSA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Bug? Text field is not viewable in a table... (Durumdara <durumdara@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Bug? Text field is not viewable in a table...
|
Список | pgadmin-support |
[Please keep the list CCd] On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 8:42 AM, Durumdara <durumdara@gmail.com> wrote: > Dear Dave! > > 2011/4/14 Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org>: >> On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 7:58 AM, Durumdara <durumdara@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Dear Developers! >>> >>> I found some problem in PGAdmin. V1.12.1, PG 9.0, Win7/X64. >>> I have a test table with "text" field. >>> I fillup this field with chr(1)...chr(255), so it contains 255 characters. >>> >>> When I try to see this table, I got error: >>> >>> ERROR: character 0x81 of encoding "WIN1250" has no equivalent in "UTF8" >>> >>> ********** Error ********** >>> >>> ERROR: character 0x81 of encoding "WIN1250" has no equivalent in "UTF8" >>> SQL state: 22P05 >> >> That error comes from PostgreSQL, and is entirely expected if you try >> to store non-printable characters in a text column, and then convert >> it to UTF-8 (which is what happens when pgAdmin requests data). >> PostgreSQL is extremely strict about enforcing the correctness of >> unicode data. > > Interesting, because the local is Win1250, and the database is Win1250 > too... :-( > > Is it PG bug? Assuming everything that is legal in win1250 does map to something in utf-8, then it sounds to me like PG isn't being as strict about enforcing the correctness of win1250 strings as it does utf-8. -- Dave Page Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com Twitter: @pgsnake EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgadmin-support по дате отправления: