Re: per-column generic option
| От | Robert Haas |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: per-column generic option |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | BANLkTi=LtNQCK3ARa4_aGzfE+Pzhw0AfVQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: per-column generic option (Shigeru Hanada <shigeru.hanada@gmail.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
2011/6/27 Shigeru Hanada <shigeru.hanada@gmail.com>: >> * It might be an option to extend attreloptions, instead of the new >> attfdwoptions. >> Although I didn't track the discussion when pg_foreign_table catalog >> that provides >> relation level fdw-options, was it impossible or unreasonable to extend existing >> design of reloptions/attoptions? >> Right now, it accepts only hard-wired options listed at reloptions.c. >> But, it seems >> to me worthwhile, if it could accept options validated by loadable modules. > > IIRC someone has objected against storing FDW options in > reloptions/attoptions, but I couldn't find such post. I'll follow the > discussion again. I think they should definitely be separate. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: