Re: BUG #6021: There is no difference between default and empty access privileges with \dp
От | Grzegorz Szpetkowski |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BUG #6021: There is no difference between default and empty access privileges with \dp |
Дата | |
Msg-id | BANLkTi=-Gsdd2d6QFCqYwUET1zCNSY9=eQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: BUG #6021: There is no difference between default and empty access privileges with \dp (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: BUG #6021: There is no difference between default and
empty access privileges with \dp
|
Список | pgsql-bugs |
What about changing empty value in \dp (\z) to {} when priviliges are really empty and leave column empty for default priviliges as it works now. I mean the same behaviour as in relacl column in pg_class catalog ? It sound simplest for me: empty string - default privileges {} - no privileges {postgres=3Darwdxt/postgres} - some privileges "If the "Access privileges" column is empty for a given object, it means the object has default privileges (that is, its privileges column is null)." from: http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.0/static/sql-grant.html I agree that "default" sounds more descriptive than "", but empty string works for me too (especially with clear documentation on that). Regards, Grzegorz Szpetkowski 2011/5/13 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>: > "psql \dp showing empty Access privileges column for {}" <gszpetkowski@gm= ail.com> writes: >> Description: =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0There is no difference between default and e= mpty access >> privileges with \dp > > Yeah. =A0It's been like that since forever, and nobody's complained > before, possibly because revoking all privileges for everybody isn't > a particularly useful real-world case. > > One possibility is to start showing "default" when the ACL is null, > which would be quite easy to implement: > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0COALESCE(array_to_string(c.relacl, E'\n'), 'default') > > But that might be too big a change. =A0Or we could take the opposite > tack of changing the display in the no-privileges case; but I don't > see a similarly compact way to do that. > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0regards, tom lane >
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: