Re: pg14 psql broke \d datname.nspname.relname
От | Mark Dilger |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg14 psql broke \d datname.nspname.relname |
Дата | |
Msg-id | BA47FED9-AF44-4059-827D-580B991649A4@enterprisedb.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg14 psql broke \d datname.nspname.relname (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg14 psql broke \d datname.nspname.relname
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> On Oct 11, 2021, at 3:04 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > Doesn't work with the correct DB name, either: > > regression=# \d public.bit_defaults > Table "public.bit_defaults" > Column | Type | Collation | Nullable | Default > --------+----------------+-----------+----------+--------------------- > b1 | bit(4) | | | '1001'::"bit" > b2 | bit(4) | | | '0101'::"bit" > b3 | bit varying(5) | | | '1001'::bit varying > b4 | bit varying(5) | | | '0101'::"bit" > > regression=# \d regression.public.bit_defaults > Did not find any relation named "regression.public.bit_defaults". REL_13_STABLE appears to accept any amount of nonsense you like: foo=# \d nonesuch.foo.a.b.c.d.bar.baz Table "bar.baz" Column | Type | Collation | Nullable | Default --------+---------+-----------+----------+--------- i | integer | | | Is this something we're intentionally supporting? There is no regression test covering this, else we'd have seen breakagein the build-farm. — Mark Dilger EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: