Re: Amazon High I/O instances
| От | Oliver Kohll - Mailing Lists |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Amazon High I/O instances |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | B9ABAC4A-5587-47EA-A72F-9BB80E0E1797@gtwm.co.uk обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Amazon High I/O instances (Sébastien Lorion <sl@thestrangefactory.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Amazon High I/O instances
|
| Список | pgsql-general |
On 21 Aug 2012, at 13:32, Vincent Veyron <vv.lists@wanadoo.fr> wrote:
Since Amazon has added new high I/O instance types and EBS volumes,
anyone has done some benchmark of PostgreSQL on them ?
I wonder : is there a reason why you have to go through the complexity
of such a setup, rather than simply use bare metal and get good
performance with simplicity?
For instance, the dedibox I use for my app (visible in sig) costs 14,00
euros/month, and sits at .03% load average with 5 active users; you can
admin it like a home pc.
This is a general 'cloud or dedicated' question, I won't go into it but I believe cloud proponents cite management ease, scalability etc. I'm sure there's a place for every type of hosting. However I would be interested in hearing some experiences of PostgreSQL on an Amazon high I/O instance, given a client has just proposed running on one. If there are none forthcoming in the short term I may be in a position to provide some results myself in a month or two.
Oliver Kohll
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: