Re: DROP EXTENSION
| От | Michelle Schwan |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: DROP EXTENSION |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | B9948C5F5585784A98B0F992EC6B2BA8065828EF@otwlxg20.opentext.net обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: DROP EXTENSION (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Список | pgsql-docs |
Ok - I understand!
However, could that be stated in the documentation so that is clear?
-----Original Message-----
From: Tom Lane [mailto:tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us]
Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2016 2:27 PM
To: Alvaro Herrera
Cc: Michael Paquier; Michelle Schwan; pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [DOCS] DROP EXTENSION
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> Right; mschwan wrote private email to indicate that the function in
> question is:
> CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION public.f_unaccent(text)
> RETURNS text AS
> $$
> select public.unaccent('public.unaccent', $1) $$
> LANGUAGE sql IMMUTABLE;
> so when the unaccent extension is dropped, this function remains (of
> course) but it stops working.
Ah, I kind of suspected that: the issue is that we don't analyze function bodies to detect dependencies therein. In a
perfectworld we would, but there are daunting obstacles in the way.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-docs по дате отправления: