Re: wal_sync_methods for AIX
От | Erik Jones |
---|---|
Тема | Re: wal_sync_methods for AIX |
Дата | |
Msg-id | B7D41D70-CAD9-416E-AD9D-D391C5B7138B@myemma.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | wal_sync_methods for AIX (Dan Langille <dan@langille.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: wal_sync_methods for AIX
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
On Feb 15, 2008, at 3:55 PM, Dan Langille wrote: > We're using PostgreSQL 8.1.11 on AIX 5.3 and we've been doing some > playing around > with various settings. So far, we've (I say we, but it's another > guy doing the work) found > that open_datasync seems better than fsync. By how much, we have > not yet determined, > but initial observations are promising. Here's a good explanation (by the Greg Smith) on the different sync methods. It basically says that if you have open_datasync available, it'll probably beat everything else. > Our tests have been on a p550 connected to DS6800 array using pgbench. > > One nasty behaviour we have seen is long running commits. Initial > thoughts connected > them with checkpoints, but the long running commits do not > correlate with checkpoints being > written. Have you seen this behaviour? > > FYI, 8.3.0 is not an option for us in the short term. > > What have you been using on AIX and why? I really don't know anything about AIX, but are you sure that these long running commits are directly correlated with using open_datasync? Erik Jones DBA | Emma® erik@myemma.com 800.595.4401 or 615.292.5888 615.292.0777 (fax) Emma helps organizations everywhere communicate & market in style. Visit us online at http://www.myemma.com
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: