Re: Replication options
От | Merrall, Graeme |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Replication options |
Дата | |
Msg-id | B7AD8B4B4A337741B62E633B4827ADD95C23ED@svrexc02.aolau.ops.au.office.aol.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Replication options ("Simon Windsor" <simon.windsor@cornfield.org.uk>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
The only negative issue is replication. I have checked several Postgres Replication options and unsure which way to go. Can anyone recommend a replication option that meets the following:
- Does not use triggers. Usually slow, and one action that modifies several records, can trigger many actions on slaves/peers.
- Does use WAL, or other log, so that SQL DDL/DML is copied to slave/peer, rather than the result of the DDL/DML.
- Must provide master-master and master-slave replication
- Simple to configure and maintain
Is there any comparative analysis of the different pgsql replication systems out there? SO far I can think of erserver (free + payware), mammoth, dbbalancer, pgreplication. Have I missed any?
If such a thing doesn't exist I could cobble few servers together and have a crack.
Cheers,
Graeme
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: