Re: TCP network cost
От | Rusty Conover |
---|---|
Тема | Re: TCP network cost |
Дата | |
Msg-id | B7A2E4DA-A137-46F5-8643-2EF3772F4D2C@infogears.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: TCP network cost ("Ross J. Reedstrom" <reedstrm@rice.edu>) |
Ответы |
Re: TCP network cost
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
On Feb 17, 2009, at 1:04 PM, Ross J. Reedstrom wrote:
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 12:20:02AM -0700, Rusty Conover wrote:Try running tests with ttcp to eliminate any PostgreSQL overhead andfind out the real bandwidth between the two machines. If its resultsare also slow, you know the problem is TCP related and not PostgreSQLrelated.
I did in fact run a simple netcat client/server pair and verified that I
can transfer that file on 0.12 sec localhost (or hostname), 0.35 over the
net, so TCP stack and network are not to blame. This is purely inside
the postgresql code issue, I believe.
What is the client software you're using? libpq?
Rusty
--
Rusty Conover
InfoGears Inc / GearBuyer.com / FootwearBuyer.com
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: