Re: Suggestions for Intel 710 SSD test
От | Gregory Gerard |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Suggestions for Intel 710 SSD test |
Дата | |
Msg-id | B75582D7-A3C2-497B-86EB-430E49814C4F@mac.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Suggestions for Intel 710 SSD test (Andy <angelflow@yahoo.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Suggestions for Intel 710 SSD test
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
How does this same benchmark compare on similar (or same) hardware but with magnetic media?
On Oct 1, 2011, at 8:22 PM, Andy wrote:
Do you have an Intel 320? I'd love to see tests comparing 710 to 320 and see if it's worth the price premium.
From: David Boreham <david_list@boreham.org>
To: PGSQL Performance <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>
Sent: Saturday, October 1, 2011 10:39 PM
Subject: [PERFORM] Suggestions for Intel 710 SSD test
I have a 710 (Lyndonville) SSD in a test server. Ultimately we'll run
capacity tests using our application (which in turn uses PG), but it'll
take a while to get those set up. In the meantime, I'd be happy to
entertain running whatever tests folks here would like to suggest,
spare time-permitting.
I've already tried bonnie++, sysbench and a simple WAL emulation
test program I wrote more than 10 years ago. The drive tests at
around 160Mbyte/s on bulk data and 4k tps for commit rate writing
small blocks.
-- Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: