Re: Microsoft buys GitHub, is this a threat to open-source
От | Justin Clift |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Microsoft buys GitHub, is this a threat to open-source |
Дата | |
Msg-id | B715312E-B16F-476D-A44F-D6CD2DF95CB4@postgresql.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Microsoft buys GitHub, is this a threat to open-source (Rich Shepard <rshepard@appl-ecosys.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
On 4 Jun 2018, at 18:31, Rich Shepard <rshepard@appl-ecosys.com> wrote: > On Mon, 4 Jun 2018, Joshua D. Drake wrote: > >> No but it does show why using non open source platforms for open source >> projects is an inherently bad idea. > > Joshua, > > Sourceforge seems to be out of favor, too, so are there any open source > platforms that provide services that sourceforge and github do? Both GitLab and BitBucket are commonly suggested. Neither seems great, but when push comes to shove "they'll do". :) For people that are ok with standing up their own servers, there are more options. Gitea (Open Source GitHub clone) is pretty good: https://gitea.io It's also very efficient resource wise (unlike GitLab), so can run effectively on tiny hardware. Even Raspberry Pi level can do a decent job for small scale stuff. Naturally, anyone with team-sized needs would run it on appropriate hardware. ;) + Justin -- "My grandfather once told me that there are two kinds of people: those who work and those who take the credit. He told me to try to be in the first group; there was less competition there." - Indira Gandhi
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: