Re: Looking for bottleneck during load test
От | Hell, Robert |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Looking for bottleneck during load test |
Дата | |
Msg-id | B710F3299F04664DB6B37C258FDEEB94015F1CD6@FABAMAIL.fabagl.fabasoft.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Looking for bottleneck during load test (Ivan Voras <ivoras@geri.cc.fer.hr>) |
Ответы |
Re: Looking for bottleneck during load test
Re: Looking for bottleneck during load test Re: Looking for bottleneck during load test |
Список | pgsql-performance |
I tried different other tools for random IO (including a self written one which does random lseek and read). This tool, started during one of our tests, achieves 2 iops (8k each). Started alone I get something about 1,500 iops with an avg latency of 100 ms. We are using SAN (EMC CLARiiON CX 300) - are those ~7 MB/s really our bottleneck? Any other tuning ideas? Regards, Robert -----Original Message----- From: pgsql-performance-owner@postgresql.org [mailto:pgsql-performance-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Ivan Voras Sent: Montag, 07. April 2008 14:38 To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [PERFORM] Looking for bottleneck during load test Hell, Robert wrote: > We have a PostgreSQL 8.2.7 database (~230 GB) running on a machine with 8 Intel Xeon Cores and 32 GB RAM (64-bit Linux2.6.18). Data is stored on an EMC² CLARiiON on RAID 1/0 (8 x 146 GB 15k rpm). > When we do random I/O with a small test tool (reading random 8k blocks from big files in 200 threads) on the disk we retrievedata with about 25 MB/s. How do you test random IO? Do you use this utility: http://arctic.org/~dean/randomio/ ? If not, try using it, with same parameters. It might be that the latency is destroying your performance. Do you use NFS or are you accessing the storage as SAN? -- Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: