Re: Stalled news about ora2pg 11 on pg.org
От | Jonathan S. Katz |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Stalled news about ora2pg 11 on pg.org |
Дата | |
Msg-id | B6B1FF55-055B-41AF-BE4A-B78A99D11A59@excoventures.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Stalled news about ora2pg 11 on pg.org (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Stalled news about ora2pg 11 on pg.org
|
Список | pgsql-www |
On Apr 15, 2013, at 4:19 PM, Magnus Hagander wrote: > On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 10:10 PM, Alvaro Herrera > <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >> Magnus Hagander wrote: >>> On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 9:59 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote: >>>> On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 12:52:54PM -0700, Josh Berkus wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> 2ndQuadrant has experienced significant delays in at least 3 cases >>>>>> also. There is definitely a problem somewhere there. >>>>> >>>>> The delay is called "volunteer moderators who have day jobs". >>>>> >>>>>> Perhaps we should make all posts wait the same length of time, to >>>>>> allow reasonable time to decide whether posts are suitable? 72 hours >>>>>> seems like a reasonable time for this. >>>>> >>>>> Who is going to do this strictly time-limited approving? >>>> >>>> So it auto-approves after 72 hours? I found this proposal vague. >>> >>> If anything automatic were to happen after 72 hours, the reasonable >>> thing would be a rejection. >> >> ... but that's not more helpful than not doing anything, because then >> the submitter needs to submit again. This creates a busy loop on which >> submitter needs to watch status of his submitted news until it gets >> approved. > > I agree. But it's the only thing we could do at all there. > > >> I think the idea behind 72-hour auto-approve is that if it's obvious >> spam someone will quickly reject it, and if it's not spam then it's not >> worth rejecting. I don't think this is very palatable either. > > Given thta our moderators *clearly* don't have time to process it, > this is almost *guarantee* to get spam postings onto our site. It > won't work. > > I think recruiting more moderators, or somehow convincing our current > ones to actually moderate more often is the only way to go. If helping to alleviate some of the delay issues would be to have more moderators, I would be happy to volunteer my time. Perhaps another initiative (though this is a tech suggestion) is to send a daily digest of news stories awaiting approvalto the moderators so that way there is a constant reminder to review news items. Jonathan
В списке pgsql-www по дате отправления: