Re: Prepared Statement Question
От | Strong, David |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Prepared Statement Question |
Дата | |
Msg-id | B6419AF36AC8524082E1BC17DA2506E802579E44@USMV-EXCH2.na.uis.unisys.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Interface of the R-tree in order to work with postgresql ("jorge alberto" <jorge.is.a.geek@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom, Thanks for the advice. Yes, we were looking at the possibility of saving the palloc(s) (malloc in some cases) on the statement. David ________________________________ From: Tom Lane [mailto:tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us] Sent: Mon 10/9/2006 9:08 AM To: Strong, David Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Prepared Statement Question "Strong, David" <david.strong@unisys.com> writes: > There is similar code for Parameter Lists (ParamListInfo) and Result Format Codes (rformats). Unless we're missing something,a prepared statement would probably never change once prepared. I think you're missing something. Or are you just proposing that we could save one palloc per Bind operation? Trust me, that ain't worth worrying about. In any case the number of parameters appearing in Bind could be different from the number appearing in the statement --- the fact that that's an error doesn't allow you to not process the message before complaining. > Along these lines, would it also be possible to keep an Executor State and Expression Context with the statement and justreset key parts of them, rather than rebuilding them from scratch each time a prepared statement is executed? Sounds highly bug-prone to me ... especially in the case where the preceding execution didn't complete normally ... regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: