Re: Connect without specifying a database?
| От | lists@mgreg.com |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Connect without specifying a database? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | B5C97ED5-2D21-46EF-ABAC-D8670D476C14@mgreg.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Connect without specifying a database? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Connect without specifying a database?
Re: Connect without specifying a database? Re: Connect without specifying a database? Re: Connect without specifying a database? Re: Connect without specifying a database? |
| Список | pgsql-general |
On Apr 11, 2009, at 11:56 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
There are, although we don't spell the commands like that. This is not
relevant to the question of whether it makes sense to connect without
being connected to a specific database. It doesn't, because the
catalogs that you have to inspect to find out anything are
database-specific.
regards, tom lane
I'm sorry, I'm confused by your reply. I may have said "table" when I meant "database". I believe it absolutely *does* make sense to connect without specifying a database first. What if you hit that edge case where there are in fact no databases? I suppose you could always run "createdb" just in case before you do anything else, but that seems counterintuitive.
What do you mean when you say the "catalogs...are database-specific" ? If I'm understanding what you're saying, my whole point is that I don't want to be tied to a database to do any kind of querying about the PG engine itself. Does that make sense?
Best,
Michael
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: