Re: Patch for collation using ICU

--On söndag, maj 08, 2005 22.19.25 +0900 Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii@sra.co.jp>
wrote:

>> > > > On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 02:07:29PM +1000, John Hansen wrote:
>> > > > > Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > > > So Japanese(including ASCII)/UNICODE behavior is
>> > > > perfectly correct
>> > > > > > at this moment.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Right, so you _never_ use accented ascii characters in
>> > Japanese?
>> > > > > (like è for example, whose uppercase is È)
>> > > >
>> > > > That isn't ASCII.  It's latin1 or some other ASCII extension.
>> > >
>> > > Point taken...
>> > > But...
>> > >
>> > > If you want EUC_JP (Japanese + ASCII) then use that as your
>> > backend encoding, not UTF-8 (unicode).
>> > > UTF-8 encoded databases are very useful for representing multiple
>> > > languages in the same database, but this usefulness
>> > vanishes if functions like upper/lower doesn't work correctly.
>> >
>> > I'm just curious if Germany/French/Spanish mixed text can be
>> > sorted correctly. I think these languages need their own
>> > locales even with UNICODE/ICU.
>>
>> No, they will not sort correctly, for that you still need the locale.
>
> I'm confused. I thought the ICU patches is intended for using on
> broken locale platforms?

It will sort correctly in *one* locale, using ICU. You still cannot mix
different locales in the same database cluster, the collation locale is
still fixed at initdb time, unfortunately.

/Palle