Re: Supply restore_command to pg_rewind via CLI argument
От | Andrey Borodin |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Supply restore_command to pg_rewind via CLI argument |
Дата | |
Msg-id | B593FE3D-324A-4A9A-AEF8-9A70DCAB7C1A@yandex-team.ru обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Supply restore_command to pg_rewind via CLI argument (Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>) |
Ответы |
Re: Supply restore_command to pg_rewind via CLI argument
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> 14 сент. 2021 г., в 18:41, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se> написал(а): > >>> Besides this patch looks good and is ready for committer IMV. > > A variant of this patch was originally objected against by Michael, and as this > version is marked Ready for Committer I would like to hear his opinions on > whether the new evidence changes anything. I skimmed the thread for reasoning. --target-restore-command was rejected on the following grounds > Do we actually need --target-restore-command at all? It seems to me > that we have all we need with --restore-target-wal, and that's not > really instinctive to pass down a command via another command.. Currently we know that --restore-target-wal is not enough if postgresql.conf does not reside within PGDATA. Best regards, Andrey Borodin.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: