Re: [HACKERS] commitfest.postgresql.org
От | decibel |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] commitfest.postgresql.org |
Дата | |
Msg-id | B585A939-F124-4CD6-B61E-BB151AD77711@decibel.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] commitfest.postgresql.org (Brendan Jurd <direvus@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-www |
On Jul 9, 2009, at 12:35 PM, Brendan Jurd wrote: > We don't AFAIK collect data about these events. However, we could > have certain actions trigger the creation of an automated comment > (e.g., "Status changed to Committed by petere") and let the > aforementioned comment view suffice for a "history". Our main system at work does that; any kind of status is stored as a raw, text "note". It sucks. It makes trying to query for specific kinds of events difficult, and it wastes a bunch of space. It's a lot better to record machine-readable information for machine- created events. If you want to present it all as one, I suggest a union view that turns the machine-understood data into a human- understandable text format. -- Decibel!, aka Jim C. Nasby, Database Architect decibel@decibel.org Give your computer some brain candy! www.distributed.net Team #1828
В списке pgsql-www по дате отправления: