Re: [PERFORMANCE] work_mem vs temp files issue
От | decibel |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [PERFORMANCE] work_mem vs temp files issue |
Дата | |
Msg-id | B43373EF-4CFC-4643-AB6E-5BC0D4A7EB58@decibel.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | [PERFORMANCE] work_mem vs temp files issue (Jaime Casanova <jcasanov@systemguards.com.ec>) |
Ответы |
Re: [PERFORMANCE] work_mem vs temp files issue
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
On Aug 19, 2009, at 7:45 PM, Jaime Casanova wrote: > AFAIUI, work_mem is used for some operations (sort, hash, etc) for > avoiding the use of temp files on disk... > > In a client server i'm monitoring (pg 8.3.7, 32GB of ram) work_mem is > set to 8MB, however i'm seeing a lot of temp files (>30000 in 4 hours) > with small sizes (ie: 2021520 obviously lower than 8MB). so, why? > maybe we use work_mem until we find isn't enough and we send just the > difference to a temp file? > > i'm not thinking in raising work_mem until i understand this well, > what's the point if we still create temp files that could fit in > work_mem... Are you using temp tables? Those end up in pgsql_tmp as well. -- Decibel!, aka Jim C. Nasby, Database Architect decibel@decibel.org Give your computer some brain candy! www.distributed.net Team #1828
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: