Re: [SPAM?] Re: PG8 Tuning
От | Jeff Trout |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [SPAM?] Re: PG8 Tuning |
Дата | |
Msg-id | B4099474-30C8-4549-A289-2EC4FD1FF4CB@torgo.978.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [SPAM?] Re: PG8 Tuning ("Jeffrey W. Baker" <jwbaker@acm.org>) |
Список | pgsql-performance |
On Aug 11, 2005, at 12:58 PM, Jeffrey W. Baker wrote: > Like Mr. Stone said earlier, this is pure dogma. In my experience, > xlogs on the same volume with data is much faster if both are on > battery-backed write-back RAID controller memory. Moving from this > situation to xlogs on a single normal disk is going to be much > slower in > most cases. > This does also point one important point about performance. Which is a touch unfortunate (and expensive to test): Your milage may vary on any of these improvements. Some people have 0 problems and incredible performance with say, 1000 shared_bufs and the WAL on the same disk.. Others need 10k shared bufs and wal split over a 900 spindle raid with data spread across 18 SAN's... Unfortunately there is no one true way :( The best bet (which is great if you can): Try out various settings.. if you still run into problems look into some more hardware.. see if you can borrow any or fabricate a "poor man"'s equivalent for testing. -- Jeff Trout <jeff@jefftrout.com> http://www.jefftrout.com/ http://www.stuarthamm.net/
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: