Problems (bug?) with the Postgres 8.4.4 optimizer
От | Daniel Wagner |
---|---|
Тема | Problems (bug?) with the Postgres 8.4.4 optimizer |
Дата | |
Msg-id | B3FF0B5EBE0E44909281E590EF4519FB@ad.cl.cam.ac.uk обсуждение исходный текст |
Список | pgsql-general |
Hi everyone. I am using Postgres 8.4.4 on a large-ish amount of data and recently noticed that my application got very slow at times. I quickly discovered that a specific query was triggering a sequential scan despite suitable indices being available. The query in question looks like this: "select * from kvstore where deviceid = 7 AND (locid >= 1410929 AND locid <= 1690468) OR (locid = 1690469 and locid <= 1690468)" Note that the last condition (locid = 2 AND locid <= 1) can never be satisfied. Now, the Postgres optimizer seems to believe that a sequential scan of 16 million rows is the right way of approaching this query, despite having accurate statistics (I ran VACUUM ANALYZE before to ensure everything is up-to-date). However, if I remove the last part and query for "select * from kvstore where deviceid = 7 AND (locid >= 1410929 AND locid <= 1690468)", indices are used and everything works nicely. And I believe that the optimizer should remove an invalid query, or at least handle it gracefully (e.g. use it as a parameter for a range query). Since it doesn't do that, I am a little stumped as to what the correct course of action for me is. I could try to manually remove "invalid" parts of my query, but then again I don't want to be patching queries to accommodate a stubborn optimizer if I don't have to... maybe I stumbled upon a bug? One more thing, while I'm already writing this message: Maybe someone can explain why for the above (working) query, and given a primary key on (deviceid, locid) Postgres decides to do a after a Bitmap Index Scan there is always another Bitmap Heap Scan
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: