Re: Code tables, conditional foreign keys?
| От | Alban Hertroys |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Code tables, conditional foreign keys? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | B3EC5FD6-ABD0-4724-AA9A-93858AF89969@solfertje.student.utwente.nl обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Code tables, conditional foreign keys? (Conrad Lender <crlender@gmail.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-general |
> Here's an example of the value groups that were contained in the > table: > > fax status: > pending, active, sent, error > department: > office, accounting, it, legal, experts > deadline type: > official, unofficial > ... > Is it really advisable to put all these values into 70 separate tables > with the exact same layout? I don't quite see the benefit. You could use the ENUM type for that (http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/datatype-enum.html ), although that works best if these values are really static. If users should be able to edit them they're probably not the best choice. Alban Hertroys -- If you can't see the forest for the trees, cut the trees and you'll see there is no forest. !DSPAM:737,4a17ca8210091499713462!
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: