Re: Proper relational database?
| От | Guyren Howe |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Proper relational database? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | B3CD42AA-E126-487A-8719-C2450D3CE5C4@gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Proper relational database? ("David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Proper relational database?
Re: Proper relational database? |
| Список | pgsql-general |
The SQL language is terrible but we can live with it.
But the answer to "Are there any relational data stores that offer eventual consistency, easy distribution, schema-on-demand or any such things a large modern application can use?" appears to be no. And that's just awful.
On Apr 22, 2016, at 12:40 , David G. Johnston <david.g.johnston@gmail.com> wrote:On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 12:25 PM, Raymond Brinzer <ray.brinzer@gmail.com> wrote:So, let's just flat-out ask.
Dear Important People: would the PostgreSQL project consider
supporting other query languages? Or creating a plug-in mechanism for
them, so that alternative interface languages could be added without
changing the base code?If by important you mean possessing a commit-bit then I don't count...but for me, such a project would have to gain significant adoption as a fork of the PostgreSQL code base before it would ever be considered for take-over by the mainline project.David J.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: