Re: List of prominent users
От | Andy Astor |
---|---|
Тема | Re: List of prominent users |
Дата | |
Msg-id | B319CFEC3B80D3408CA36F99ADE840944E18B4@edb-dc1.Edb-net.EnterpriseDB.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | List of prominent users (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: List of prominent users
|
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
My 2 cents... It is common practice to list customers on web sites. It's also common for companies to ask to be removed. I suggest we just put up the list, and take people off if they ask. Of course, if a company or agency had previously told us their involvement was confidential, we would respect that. We should just go with the list. There's unlikely to be any problem that can't be rectified easily. -- Andy Andy Astor EnterpriseDB Corporation > -----Original Message----- > From: pgsql-advocacy-owner@postgresql.org [mailto:pgsql-advocacy- > owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Joshua D. Drake > Sent: Sunday, December 04, 2005 12:30 PM > To: Greg Sabino Mullane > Cc: pgsql-advocacy@postgresql.org > Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] List of prominent users > > > > > No, they can't. We can't create a product called "Orakle", but we can > > certainly talk about the company Oracle(tm) all we want. I don't see > > the big deal with posting such a list: if a company does not want to > > be on it, they can send us an email and we'd more than likely comply. > > > Trade Secret. > > I am not saying they would. I am saying the could. > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? > > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: