> On 17 Nov 2025, at 05:06, jian he <jian.universality@gmail.com> wrote:
> In the example above , the primary error message "unique
> constraint..." seems confusing.
Some of the internals does seem bleed through. Do you want to work on a patch
for a suggestion on an improvement? Maybe it could be possible to improve the
wording by incorporating constraint_type in some way?
--
Daniel Gustafsson