Re: Additional SPI functions

On Dec 20, 2009, at 12:03 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Why not code a loop around one of the existing SPI execution functions?

*shrug* seemed nicer to push it on the parser than to force the user to split up the statements/calls. Or split up the
statementsmyself(well, the parser does it so swimmingly =). 

It's purpose is to allow the user to put a chunk of SQL into a single big block:

sqlexec("""CREATE TEMP TABLE one ...;CREATE TEMP TABLE two ...;<init temp tables with data for use in the procedure>
""")

For me, that tends to read better than breaking up the calls.
Well, the above may be a bad example for crying about readability, but I'm thinking of cases with a bit more SQL in
em'..


[spi_prepare_statement]
> This looks like it's most likely redundant with the stuff I added
> recently for the plpgsql parser rewrite.

If that allows me to identify the parameter type Oids of the statement, optionally supply constant parameters after
identifyingthe types(so I can properly create the parameter Datums), and provides access to the resultDesc, then yes it
isredundant. Personally, I'm hoping for redundant. =) 

>  Please see if you can use that instead.


I took a very short peak (wasn't really looking..) earlier today (err yesterday now) and nothing jumped out at me, but
I'lltake a closer look now. 


Thanks =)