Re: Threads vs Processes
От | Myron Scott |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Threads vs Processes |
Дата | |
Msg-id | B1E52B14-EFAE-11D7-A904-00039301524A@sacadia.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Threads vs Processes (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thursday, September 25, 2003, at 10:03 AM, Tom Lane wrote: > Shridhar Daithankar <shridhar_daithankar@persistent.co.in> writes: >> One thing that can be done is to arrange all globals/statics in a >> structure and make that structure thread local. > > That's about as far from "non-invasive" as I can imagine :-( > > I really, really want to avoid doing anything like the above, because > it > would force us to expose to the whole backend many data structures and > state variables that are currently local to individual .c files. That > complicates understanding and debugging tremendously, not to mention > slowing the edit/compile/debug cycle when you are changing such > structures. Another option would be to create thread local hashtable or other lookup structure to which you would register a structure for a particular .c file or group of files. You could then define the structures you need locally without affecting other parts of the codebase. Myron Scott
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: