Re: Datetime
От | Michael Glaesemann |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Datetime |
Дата | |
Msg-id | B161AE30-E550-11D8-8966-000A95C88220@myrealbox.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Datetime (Achilleus Mantzios <achill@matrix.gatewaynet.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Datetime
|
Список | pgsql-sql |
On Aug 3, 2004, at 8:50 PM, Achilleus Mantzios wrote: > O kyrios Michael Glaesemann egrapse stis Aug 3, 2004 : >> >> I believe this is incorrect. I believe PostgreSQL uses its own > > Do you suggest postgresql has any other means of getting > time except the time(2) syscall?? > >> timestamp datatype internally (which is, indeed, not as text in an >> easy-to-read form). On my machine (running cvs-head), No. I'm just saying that PostgreSQL does not represent or store timestamps as epoch timestamps internally. I don't know for sure how PostgreSQL gets the current timestamp, and I wouldn't be surprised if it was via the time(2) syscall. Michael Glaesemann grzm myrealbox com
В списке pgsql-sql по дате отправления: