Re: VACUUM VERBOSE 8.1dev
От | Dave Cramer |
---|---|
Тема | Re: VACUUM VERBOSE 8.1dev |
Дата | |
Msg-id | B05F8933-4468-47E3-85AD-050DB28E4444@fastcrypt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | VACUUM VERBOSE 8.1dev ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
I'm not even sure that the new output does tell me the same thing. I certainly prefer the previous output. I think this will be very confusing to users who aren't familiar with the internals of postgres. Dave On 13-Sep-05, at 11:44 PM, Joshua D. Drake wrote: > Hello, > > It seems the new VACUUM VERBOSE output is not quite as helpful as 8.0. > In 8.0 I get a nice output at the end like this: > > INFO: free space map: 1377 relations, 22478 pages stored; 44112 > total pages needed > DETAIL: Allocated FSM size: 100000 relations + 2000000 pages = > 17702 kB shared memory. > > Which tells me exactly what I need to do with max_fsm_pages/relations. > > The new output appears: > > booktown=# VACUUM FULL VERBOSE books ; > INFO: vacuuming "public.books" > INFO: "books": found 32804 removable, 14 nonremovable row versions > in 242 pages > DETAIL: 0 dead row versions cannot be removed yet. > Nonremovable row versions range from 48 to 72 bytes long. > There were 0 unused item pointers. > Total free space (including removable row versions) is 1845484 bytes. > 241 pages are or will become empty, including 241 at the end of the > table. > 1 pages containing 6768 free bytes are potential move destinations. > > I am sure the above tells me the same thing but not as easily. > > Comments? > > Sincerely, > > Joshua D. Drake > > -- > Your PostgreSQL solutions company - Command Prompt, Inc. > 1.800.492.2240 > PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Programming, 24x7 support > Managed Services, Shared and Dedicated Hosting > Co-Authors: plPHP, plPerlNG - http://www.commandprompt.com/ > > > ---------------------------(end of > broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to > choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not > match > >
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: