Re: Extending PostgreSQL with a Domain-Specific Language (DSL) -Development
От | Tom Mercha |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Extending PostgreSQL with a Domain-Specific Language (DSL) -Development |
Дата | |
Msg-id | AM6PR04MB5544B53712F935CA49C95397F4F00@AM6PR04MB5544.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Extending PostgreSQL with a Domain-Specific Language (DSL) - Development ("David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Extending PostgreSQL with a Domain-Specific Language (DSL) - Development
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 10/07/2019 02:31, David G. Johnston wrote: > On Tue, Jul 9, 2019 at 5:23 PM Tom Mercha <mercha_t@hotmail.com> wrote: > >> >> I understand that you never wrote any PL handler but was just thinking >> about this functionality as a follow-up to our conversation. I was just >> wondering whether anonymous DO blocks *must* return void or not? >> >> The docs for DO say it is a function returning void - >> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/sql-do.html > > > >> > > But the docs for CREATE LANGUAGE's INLINE HANDLER say 'typically return >> void' - https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/sql-createlanguage.html > > > No, the language cannot override the SQL execution environment's > limitations. > > "The code block is treated as though it were the body of a function with no > parameters, returning void. It is parsed and executed a single time." > > The above applies regardless of the language the code block is written in. > > It can, however, affect permanent session state (so, use tables). > Thank you very much for addressing the question. I am still a bit of a novice with PostgreSQL internals. Could you please provide some more detail on your comment regarding affecting permanent session state? > David J. >
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: