Re: reserving space in a rec for future update
От | Erik Jones |
---|---|
Тема | Re: reserving space in a rec for future update |
Дата | |
Msg-id | AE1E3344-6BA9-4356-8401-6B8E0C39DE9B@myemma.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: reserving space in a rec for future update (Mike Charnoky <noky@nextbus.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: reserving space in a rec for future update
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On Nov 14, 2007, at 10:44 AM, Mike Charnoky wrote: > In this usage scenario, doesn't the new HOT (heap only tuples) feature > of PG8.3 help, in terms of the DB requiring less VACUUM maintenance? > > I am similarly performing a huge number of inserts, followed by a huge > number of updates to fill in a few null fields. The data is > indexed by > insert time. My problem is, selects using that index degrade over > time > as updates are performed, presumably because data is no longer ordered > sequentially across pages after updates are performed. I was hoping > that HOT would help here and am actually installing PG8.3 now in order > to perform some testing... > > > Mike Some, what HOT does is keeps index rows from being updated when updates are made to column values that aren't indexed. The same insert/delete still happens in the table data. Erik Jones Software Developer | Emma® erik@myemma.com 800.595.4401 or 615.292.5888 615.292.0777 (fax) Emma helps organizations everywhere communicate & market in style. Visit us online at http://www.myemma.com
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: