Re: BUG #8291: postgres_fdw does not re-read USER MAPING after change.
От | Albin, Lloyd P |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BUG #8291: postgres_fdw does not re-read USER MAPING after change. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | AE011E7AE62117479360E1E2BD341F4E0933D8@adama.fhcrc.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: BUG #8291: postgres_fdw does not re-read USER MAPING after change. (Bernd Helmle <mailings@oopsware.de>) |
Список | pgsql-bugs |
I realized that postgres_fdw is caching the connection, but when you have e= xisting items that use the same USER MAPPING and do not cache it such as db= link you get inconsistency in implementation and this should be avoided. Lloyd -----Original Message----- From: Bernd Helmle [mailto:mailings@oopsware.de]=20 Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2013 3:34 PM To: Albin, Lloyd P; pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [BUGS] BUG #8291: postgres_fdw does not re-read USER MAPING af= ter change. --On 9. Juli 2013 22:05:20 +0000 lalbin@fhcrc.org wrote: > I have found that if you change the password in the USER MAPPING, that=20 > postgres_fdw will not use it unless the current password fails or you=20 > close and re-open your postgres connection. I found this while testing=20 > to see if the USER MAPPING's supports MD5 passwords and they appeared=20 > to until the next day when I found that they no longer worked because=20 > I had closed and re-opened my connection. > Hmm i don't think that's a bug. It's because the postgres_fdw caches the co= nnection within your local session, reusing it for any subsequent foreign t= able access. > > The second error that I found is in the documentation of ALTER USER > MAPPING. It incorrectly says how to update a users password. > > It could be misread, i agree. Attached is a small doc patch to address this= =20 against HEAD. --=20 Thanks Bernd
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: