Re: Should we add xid_current() or a int8->xid cast?
От | Mark Dilger |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Should we add xid_current() or a int8->xid cast? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | ACCF36E5-5342-4AE5-B5A4-E0EC67E4F248@enterprisedb.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Should we add xid_current() or a int8->xid cast? (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Should we add xid_current() or a int8->xid cast?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> On Apr 2, 2020, at 7:39 PM, Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> wrote: > > <v9-0001-Add-SQL-type-xid8-to-expose-FullTransactionId-to-.patch><v9-0002-Introduce-xid8_XXX-functions-to-replace-txid_XXX.patch><v9-0003-Replace-all-txid_XXX-usage-in-tests-with-xid8_XXX.patch> These apply cleanly, build and pass check-world on mac, and the documentation and regression test changes surrounding txidlook good to me. FYI, (not the responsibility of this patch), we never quite define what the abbreviation "xip" stands for. If "Active xid8sat the time of the snapshot." were rewritten as "In progress xid8s at the time of the snapshot", it might be slightlyeasier for the reader to figure out that "xip" = "Xid8s In Progress". As it stands, nothing in the docs seems toexplain the abbrevation. See doc/src/sgml/func.sgml — Mark Dilger EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: