Re: Fwd: [JDBC] Weird issues when reading UDT from stored function
От | Florian Pflug |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Fwd: [JDBC] Weird issues when reading UDT from stored function |
Дата | |
Msg-id | AC9A9506-36C4-415A-9C1D-40CBB80C450A@phlo.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Fwd: [JDBC] Weird issues when reading UDT from stored function (Oliver Jowett <oliver@opencloud.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Fwd: [JDBC] Weird issues when reading UDT from stored
function
Re: Fwd: [JDBC] Weird issues when reading UDT from stored function |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Feb17, 2011, at 01:14 , Oliver Jowett wrote: > Any suggestions about how the JDBC driver can express the query to get > the behavior that it wants? Specifically, the driver wants to call a > particular function with N OUT or INOUT parameters (and maybe some other > IN parameters too) and get a resultset with N columns back. There's no sane way to do that, I fear. You could of course look up the function definition in the catalog before actually calling it, but with overloading and polymorphic types finding the right pg_proc entry seems awfully complex. Your best option is probably to just document this caveat... best regards, Florian Pflug
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: