Re: Allow GRANT/REVOKE permissions to be applied to all schema objects with one command
От | Matthias Schmidt |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Allow GRANT/REVOKE permissions to be applied to all schema objects with one command |
Дата | |
Msg-id | AC7B503A-7169-11D9-882A-000393AA75A0@mock-software.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Allow GRANT/REVOKE permissions to be applied to all schema objects with one command (Matthias Schmidt <schmidtm@mock-software.de>) |
Ответы |
Re: Allow GRANT/REVOKE permissions to be applied to all schema objects with one command
Re: Allow GRANT/REVOKE permissions to be applied to all schema objects with one command |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi everybody, I thought a little bit on possible GRANT syntax for granting to groups of objects. In general, we have the following entities we can grant permissions to: 1. TABLE 2. DATABASE 3. FUNCTION 4. LANGUAGE 5. SCHEMA 6. TABLESPACE since the requirement is to grant to all objects in a given schema (hope this still holds true) we are interested in: TABLE FUNCTION LANGUAGE The others (DATABASE, SCHEMA, TABLESPACE) are basically ruled out. I suspect that the majority of users like to grant to TABLE's and FUNCTIONS most of the time rather than LANGUAGE (correct me if i'm wrong). This reduces the question to TABLE's and probably FUNCTION's. Now we have two choices: a) accept some sort of wildcard for the grant on table syntax: GRANT ... ON TABLE schema.* b) use something like CASCADE for the grant on schema syntax: GRANT ... ON SCHEMA CASCADE In this case the grant on schema'sneed to swallow the permissions (SELECT, INSERT, UPDATE ...) which are intended for TABLES. This seems to me kind of strange. therefore I vote for Syntax a) What do you think? cheers, Matthias > Hi Tom + *, > > as I learned from severall posts this TODO splits into two distinct > TODO's > > TODO1: Allow GRANT/REVOKE permissions to be applied to all schema > objects with one command. > TODO2: Assign Permissions to schemas wich get automatically inherited > by objects created in the schema. > > my questions are: > > a) should we pursue both of them? > b) how can a syntax for TODO1 look like? Anchored at 'GRANT ... ON > SCHEMA' or 'GRANT ... ON <objecttype>' ? > > greetings, > > Matthias > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > Matthias Schmidt > Viehtriftstr. 49 > > 67346 Speyer > GERMANY > > Tel.: +49 6232 4867 > Fax.: +49 6232 640089 > > > ---------------------------(end of > broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? > > http://archives.postgresql.org > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Matthias Schmidt Viehtriftstr. 49 67346 Speyer GERMANY Tel.: +49 6232 4867 Fax.: +49 6232 640089
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: