Re: "Keyed" sequence?
| От | Israel Brewster |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: "Keyed" sequence? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | AC2065E0-1F2D-4C45-8DE0-A48432F2FCFE@ravnalaska.net обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: "Keyed" sequence? ("David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-general |
On Apr 28, 2016, at 11:21 AM, David G. Johnston <david.g.johnston@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> It'll kill your performance, but if aesthetics are that important to you...
They're not *that* important. I was just asking if there was a way to do this easily.While the performance argument might be true it is heavily dependent upon concurrency. I'm doubting a PO system in the typical company has enough concurrency, and is sensitivity enough to small delays,that giving up the benefit of sequential numbering would be a worthwhile trade-off.
I'm thinking the same - especially considering that we aren't exactly a huge company.
David J.
-----------------------------------------------
Israel Brewster
Systems Analyst II
Ravn Alaska
5245 Airport Industrial Rd
Fairbanks, AK 99709
(907) 450-7293
-----------------------------------------------
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: