Re: psql's \dn versus temp schemas
| От | Robert Haas |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: psql's \dn versus temp schemas |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | AANLkTinzcTJBTtaj27Nw=-i6hfU5Pzwzo8atwOt=b3N2@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: psql's \dn versus temp schemas (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: psql's \dn versus temp schemas
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 6:35 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 3:11 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> This is at least inconsistent and at worst wildly misleading. ISTM >> we ought to adopt some combination of the following ideas: > > I vote for this combination: > >> 3. Don't show either pg_temp_nn or pg_toast_temp_nn schemas, not even >> for the current backend. > > and > >> With any of 1-3 we could also consider adding a rule that \dn+ >> doesn't hide them. Or perhaps another option would be to make \dnS display these. Not sure whether I like that or not. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise Postgres Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: