Re: BUG #5889: "Intersects" for polygons broken
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BUG #5889: "Intersects" for polygons broken |
Дата | |
Msg-id | AANLkTinwz9v6diR2NaHSqNA8tJSS94NrNyYTP-Rp4soZ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: BUG #5889: "Intersects" for polygons broken (Konrad Garus <konrad.garus@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: BUG #5889: "Intersects" for polygons broken
|
Список | pgsql-bugs |
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 3:20 PM, Konrad Garus <konrad.garus@gmail.com> wrote: > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/functions-geometry.html > > I wish it explained what arguments each of the operators accepts, and > whether any automatic conversions take place (like polygon to box in > that 8.3 issue). > > What happens when I call ?# or ?- on a polygon and point? Two points? Open path? > > Some of these are obvious, but others not so much. Hmm, yeah. That looks like it could be improved. It's certainly not obvious to me what box * point means, for example, even though the description says scaling/rotation. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: