Re: Replication logging
От | Magnus Hagander |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Replication logging |
Дата | |
Msg-id | AANLkTinwjFGE2sRxAde2RXQ_ZDBt5T_bg8Hedr1P+-=2@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Replication logging (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Replication logging
Re: Replication logging |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 10:56, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 5:17 PM, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote: >>> We should treat log_disconnections the same? >> >> We could keep it a boolean, but then only log disconnections for the >> cases that are mentioned in log_connections? >> >> It doesn't make sense to log disconnection for a connection we didn't >> log the connection for... > > Maybe true. But, at least for me, it's more intuitive to provide both as > enum parameters. Is there *any* usecase for setting them differently though? (other than connections being <something> and disconnectoins being <none>?) If not, aren't we just encouraging people to configure in a way that makes no sense? -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: